<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Cable Should Be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://catherinefavazza.com/2009/06/05/how-cable-should-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://catherinefavazza.com/2009/06/05/how-cable-should-be/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:09:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: time warner cable tv</title>
		<link>http://catherinefavazza.com/2009/06/05/how-cable-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>time warner cable tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherinefavazza.com/?p=1093#comment-352</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;time warner cable tv...&lt;/strong&gt;

I am happy that I found a post related to time warner cable tv here....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>time warner cable tv&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I am happy that I found a post related to time warner cable tv here&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cable tv channels</title>
		<link>http://catherinefavazza.com/2009/06/05/how-cable-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>cable tv channels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherinefavazza.com/?p=1093#comment-340</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;cable tv channels...&lt;/strong&gt;

I have been looking for a long time and found this post. Thanks a lot....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>cable tv channels&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I have been looking for a long time and found this post. Thanks a lot&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: time warner cable tv packages</title>
		<link>http://catherinefavazza.com/2009/06/05/how-cable-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>time warner cable tv packages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherinefavazza.com/?p=1093#comment-334</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;time warner cable tv packages...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post enabled me to come out which fresh content on time warner cable tv packages. Any similar posts like this?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>time warner cable tv packages&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post enabled me to come out which fresh content on time warner cable tv packages. Any similar posts like this?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minute prologue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shanghai Media Group</title>
		<link>http://catherinefavazza.com/2009/06/05/how-cable-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>minute prologue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shanghai Media Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 11:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherinefavazza.com/?p=1093#comment-303</guid>
		<description>[...] How Cable Should Be: Choice for Parents and Families, Plus &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Cable Should Be: Choice for Parents and Families, Plus &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyfeet</title>
		<link>http://catherinefavazza.com/2009/06/05/how-cable-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>happyfeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 21:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherinefavazza.com/?p=1093#comment-301</guid>
		<description>This is kinda if you really want to know what I think sort of too old school but I applaud where this is coming from.

We has the technologies now to actually create a model where cable channels would get their carriage monies as a direct function of actual viewing.

If I watched some stupid cable show, that channel would get a small slice of my fee for that month. That channel would also know which shows drive fees and which shows don&#039;t.

It&#039;s that sort of feedback loop which will go much further to prevent your monies from going to douchebags.

This would be very effective except for Jeff Immelt&#039;s channels because he cares more about broadcasting propaganda than making money because his loser GE company mostly depends on sucking the teat of our dirty socialist government and exploiting Barack Obama&#039;s global warming scam instead of actually creating for real value like non-loser companies do.

It&#039;s very sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is kinda if you really want to know what I think sort of too old school but I applaud where this is coming from.</p>
<p>We has the technologies now to actually create a model where cable channels would get their carriage monies as a direct function of actual viewing.</p>
<p>If I watched some stupid cable show, that channel would get a small slice of my fee for that month. That channel would also know which shows drive fees and which shows don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s that sort of feedback loop which will go much further to prevent your monies from going to douchebags.</p>
<p>This would be very effective except for Jeff Immelt&#8217;s channels because he cares more about broadcasting propaganda than making money because his loser GE company mostly depends on sucking the teat of our dirty socialist government and exploiting Barack Obama&#8217;s global warming scam instead of actually creating for real value like non-loser companies do.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unbundle Cable [Dan Collins]</title>
		<link>http://catherinefavazza.com/2009/06/05/how-cable-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Unbundle Cable [Dan Collins]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherinefavazza.com/?p=1093#comment-300</guid>
		<description>[...] if you don&#8217;t want to support MTV, if you don&#8217;t care to get MSNBC, please check out this post. Make a real nuisance of yourself to your representatives. It&#8217;s the only way they&#8217;ll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if you don&#8217;t want to support MTV, if you don&#8217;t care to get MSNBC, please check out this post. Make a real nuisance of yourself to your representatives. It&#8217;s the only way they&#8217;ll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray</title>
		<link>http://catherinefavazza.com/2009/06/05/how-cable-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherinefavazza.com/?p=1093#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Hear, Hear, Katie! 

In our community, they took and moved the local access channel from the &quot;free&quot; basic tier to a premium (albeit not the highest premium) tier. So now, those who want to follow city govt are forced to pay an additional fee for the one local access channel, which -- btw -- was part of the original arrangement that permitted the cable company to gain our city&#039;s contract, or they have to go without.

And to add insult to injury, the cable company moved CSPAN 2 and 3 to this new premium tier, so basic cable subscribers have access only to CSPAN 1. Maybe when everyone&#039;s been driven to the web to watch what they want, things will change.

Thanks for this excellent post, and the great links out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear, Hear, Katie! </p>
<p>In our community, they took and moved the local access channel from the &#8220;free&#8221; basic tier to a premium (albeit not the highest premium) tier. So now, those who want to follow city govt are forced to pay an additional fee for the one local access channel, which &#8212; btw &#8212; was part of the original arrangement that permitted the cable company to gain our city&#8217;s contract, or they have to go without.</p>
<p>And to add insult to injury, the cable company moved CSPAN 2 and 3 to this new premium tier, so basic cable subscribers have access only to CSPAN 1. Maybe when everyone&#8217;s been driven to the web to watch what they want, things will change.</p>
<p>Thanks for this excellent post, and the great links out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottO</title>
		<link>http://catherinefavazza.com/2009/06/05/how-cable-should-be/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://catherinefavazza.com/?p=1093#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Excellent post, Katie! I have always despised the necessity of buying &quot;packages&quot;. For instance, I would love to have the Tennis Channel, but I would have to also get 20 other channels for things I don&#039;t care about, like college football and auto racing.

I&#039;m going to tell everybody I know to read this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, Katie! I have always despised the necessity of buying &#8220;packages&#8221;. For instance, I would love to have the Tennis Channel, but I would have to also get 20 other channels for things I don&#8217;t care about, like college football and auto racing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to tell everybody I know to read this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
